July 31, 2010, 12:32:42 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 [80] 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 ... 91   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: 2010 Offseason Wheeling and Dealing  (Read 34098 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Lintyfresh85

Online Online

Posts: 8761


Pay the man his money!




Ignore
« Reply #1975 on: February 07, 2010, 04:46:39 PM »

LAC. Wink
Logged
KnorrForYourMoney

Offline Offline

Posts: 9451


^treated for nauseau by Nats trainers




Ignore
« Reply #1976 on: February 07, 2010, 05:39:57 PM »

Why worry about Estes? Do you really think he'll play a major part for the Nats this year?
I think he's a waste of space/resources.  Any nanosecond spent by our coaches doing anything to assess/assist him is a nanosecond too many.
Logged
PANatsFan

Offline Offline

Posts: 20294


For you Nationals of today r players of the grave




Ignore
« Reply #1977 on: February 07, 2010, 05:40:25 PM »

how so? what did he say?


1) No interview with Kennedy, and Hudson is not exactly a riveting interview

2) Acting like he wanted to go to the Twins all along

3) It was a couple days ago <laughing>

Logged
JMW4th

Offline Offline

Posts: 13983


It's called "being a badass".


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #1978 on: February 07, 2010, 05:58:18 PM »

I think he's a waste of space/resources.  Any nanosecond spent by our coaches doing anything to assess/assist him is a nanosecond too many.

this.
Logged
imref

Online Online

Posts: 2419





Ignore
« Reply #1979 on: February 08, 2010, 07:25:34 PM »

Anyone have any thoughts as to why we haven't tried to sign Braden Looper as a possible starter?  he's nothing special, but he can eat some innings.
Logged
JCA-CrystalCity

Offline Offline

Posts: 3590


Cites Fangraphs too much.




Ignore
« Reply #1980 on: February 08, 2010, 08:46:11 PM »

Anyone have any thoughts as to why we haven't tried to sign Braden Looper as a possible starter?  he's nothing special, but he can eat some innings.

I think what is happening is that, unless something elite or a big upgrade (think Bedard or Wang) falls into their lap, they are not going to bring in another innings eater.  I think they still want to know whether any of their 3-4-5 starter types can actually make the grade.  If Stammen is healthy, then they probably figure that Marquis - Lannan gets them 400 IP, and that among Olsen, Stammen, Detwiler, Balester, Martin, Martis, and whatever, they more or less have the starting innings covered, at better than a 5 ERA.  They hope they have 1 or 2 real contributors among Stammen / Detwiler / Balester, and acceptable depth among Martin and Martis to give them the 8 or so 50+ IP pitchers most teams use over a season.
Logged
Lintyfresh85

Online Online

Posts: 8761


Pay the man his money!




Ignore
« Reply #1981 on: February 08, 2010, 08:55:10 PM »

I'm worried about the rotation this year. In his last blog, Wood said Mock was the #3 starter going into camp.

That scares me.
Logged
JCA-CrystalCity

Offline Offline

Posts: 3590


Cites Fangraphs too much.




Ignore
« Reply #1982 on: February 08, 2010, 09:14:10 PM »

About a month ago, a really sharp poster came up with this:
For the record, I do not believe there is such a thing as excess starting pitching, therefore I do not advocate turning anyone into an extra in a Charlton Heston movie. 

In 2009, most every NL team uses 6-8 starters more than 50 IP, and half use at least one more more than 40 IP. 

9 - NYM, 9 SD (+1 > 40 IP)
8 - FLA, MIL (+1 over 40 IP), WSN (+2 >= 40 IP)
7 - Hou, LAD, PHI (+1> 40 IP), PIT (+1 > 40 IP), St. L.,
6 - AZ, ATL, CHI, CIN (+3 over 40 IP),
5 -Col (+2 > 40), SF (+1  > 40 IP)

Figure that between our top 3 teams (H'burg, Syr, and Was), you need 12 or so pitchers who will pitch a lot at MLB or AAA, counting guys who backfill from AA for AAA callups.

This season may depend a bit on how well Scott Olsen bounces back. Concievably, they could be well set with Marquis - Lannan - Olsen - Stammen - Detwiler, with depth from Balester and Martin and Strasburg available by mid-season.  Toss in the various Mocks, Martises, Chicos etc... and they are in OK shape.  I'm also forgetting a veteran on a minor league contract.  I'm nervous about having three holes for much of the year and not just two slots playing sink or swim.  That's why I want a Bedard / Wang in here, to push Olsen down into the mix for #4 and to give #3 quality innings.  I want about 180 IP between Olsen and another good arm.  But I rant about this once a week.
Logged
DPMOmaha

Offline Offline

Posts: 7523


Midwest Correspondant




Ignore
« Reply #1983 on: February 08, 2010, 09:22:18 PM »

I'm worried about the rotation this year. In his last blog, Wood said Mock was the #3 starter going into camp.

That scares me.
Meh, beyond our 1 and 2 no one has a defined role.  The closest anyone has to a defined role in the rotation beyond that is Scott Olsen who has the inside track at the #3 spot, IMO.  I'm not gonna get too worked up over it.  If we were gearing up for a playoff run, that might be a different story, but we're not this year.
Logged
sportsfan882

Offline Offline

Posts: 46680





Ignore
« Reply #1984 on: February 08, 2010, 09:48:02 PM »

damn, that's negative. what happened to your old optimistic spirit? <skeptical look>
Logged
Lintyfresh85

Online Online

Posts: 8761


Pay the man his money!




Ignore
« Reply #1985 on: February 08, 2010, 09:54:57 PM »

I wouldn't call it negative... he's just being a realist.
Logged
PatsNats28

Online Online

Posts: 5551


New team mascot!




Ignore
« Reply #1986 on: February 08, 2010, 10:10:46 PM »

remember when ronny used to be realistic? i actually barely see him nowadays
Logged
DPMOmaha

Offline Offline

Posts: 7523


Midwest Correspondant




Ignore
« Reply #1987 on: February 08, 2010, 10:17:45 PM »

damn, that's negative. what happened to your old optimistic spirit? <skeptical look>
Was that directed at me?

I'm very optimistic this team will take a significant step forward.  I just don't think the playoffs are the goal for this year.  I'm not going to get too worked up the back end of our rotation just yet.  If we've got the same rotation a year from now, that will be a different story.  I like the direction in general though and you still won't see me give up on a game before the first pitch once this year.  

 Cheesy
Logged
Spinman

Offline Offline

Posts: 880


Grandpa Spinman




Ignore
« Reply #1988 on: February 08, 2010, 10:50:41 PM »

I think what is happening is that, unless something elite or a big upgrade (think Bedard or Wang) falls into their lap, they are not going to bring in another innings eater.  I think they still want to know whether any of their 3-4-5 starter types can actually make the grade.  If Stammen is healthy, then they probably figure that Marquis - Lannan gets them 400 IP, and that among Olsen, Stammen, Detwiler, Balester, Martin, Martis, and whatever, they more or less have the starting innings covered, at better than a 5 ERA.  They hope they have 1 or 2 real contributors among Stammen / Detwiler / Balester, and acceptable depth among Martin and Martis to give them the 8 or so 50+ IP pitchers most teams use over a season.
JCA- Your assesment on the rotation is spot on right! What we tend to forget is that most teams don't have 1-2 guys from their farm systems in their rotation. We are expecting to get 3-4 guys from our farm system. With Lannan, Stammen, Balester, Detwiler and Strasburg  all from our system. If we even get 2-3 guys out of this group to stick with the club as starters we will have the makings of a " Braves of the 90's" type of foundation.

JD is from the Indians. Mock is from Arizona.
Logged
JMW4th

Offline Offline

Posts: 13983


It's called "being a badass".


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #1989 on: February 09, 2010, 05:15:18 PM »

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2010/02/wang-has-offers-could-sign-soon.html
Logged
Lintyfresh85

Online Online

Posts: 8761


Pay the man his money!




Ignore
« Reply #1990 on: February 09, 2010, 05:18:03 PM »

Come on Nats.

He'd plug a huge hole.
Logged
tomterp
Global Moderator
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16013


You know where I come from, we party together.



« Reply #1991 on: February 09, 2010, 05:18:15 PM »


Could be a nice addition to the rotation if he is able to come back.  Maybe they blow the money saved on Hudson?
Logged
Nathan

Offline Offline

Posts: 3202


I has a sad :'(




Ignore
« Reply #1992 on: February 09, 2010, 05:19:27 PM »

Come on Nats.

He'd plug a huge hole.
<doh!>


<laughing>
Logged
UMDNats
formerly Nats19

Online Online

Posts: 8477


a serious jamjob




Ignore
« Reply #1993 on: February 09, 2010, 06:03:08 PM »

Quote
washingnats
 
The #Nats are “aggressively pursuing” Chien-Ming Wang, according to a baseball source. It’s not known of if they have made an offer.
Logged
DPMOmaha

Offline Offline

Posts: 7523


Midwest Correspondant




Ignore
« Reply #1994 on: February 09, 2010, 06:21:17 PM »

this'd have to be a 2 year deal, right?  It wouldn't make much sense to bring him in for just this year.  If he can get close to where he was and, as I and others have mentioned before, they bring in one of those big name FA's next year, suddenly Washington's a player in the NL East in 2011. 
Logged
PANatsFan

Offline Offline

Posts: 20294


For you Nationals of today r players of the grave




Ignore
« Reply #1995 on: February 09, 2010, 06:31:39 PM »

this'd have to be a 2 year deal, right?  It wouldn't make much sense to bring him in for just this year.  If he can get close to where he was and, as I and others have mentioned before, they bring in one of those big name FA's next year, suddenly Washington's a player in the NL East in 2011. 

That would give you a rotation of Strasburg, Marquis, Lannan, Wang, and FA . . . You could do without the FA, even.
Logged
ronnynat

Online Online

Posts: 20880





Ignore
« Reply #1996 on: February 09, 2010, 06:35:56 PM »

Not getting my hopes up, but it'd be awesome if we got him.
Logged
cmdterps44

Online Online

Posts: 6954


Josh Willinghammer




Ignore
« Reply #1997 on: February 09, 2010, 06:41:39 PM »

Not getting my hopes up, but it'd be awesome if we got him.

This. I've been disappointed many times before. If we are mentioned i'll just go with that we have a really slim chance. I do like that rotation though. Zimmermann/Webb Tongue Tongue
Logged
DPMOmaha

Offline Offline

Posts: 7523


Midwest Correspondant




Ignore
« Reply #1998 on: February 09, 2010, 06:51:39 PM »

That would give you a rotation of Strasburg, Marquis, Lannan, Wang, and FA . . . You could do without the FA, even.
Maybe, if Zmann get's back to form...or we could jump right into the fray and be serious about things.
Logged
ronnynat

Online Online

Posts: 20880





Ignore
« Reply #1999 on: February 09, 2010, 06:54:10 PM »

Hopefully no one has given up on Detwiler yet. I still think he could be a solid Major League pitcher.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 [80] 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 ... 91   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.15 seconds with 18 queries.