March 12, 2010, 08:00:51 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 31   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Division-Watching (2009)  (Read 18367 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
imref

Offline Offline

Posts: 438





Ignore
« Reply #600 on: November 27, 2009, 08:50:03 PM »

John Perrotto via twitter:

Quote
Keep hearing #Marlins are very willing to trade Josh Johnson right now for the right package.

What could we give them?
Logged
ASSCLOWN
aka sportsfan882

Offline Offline

Posts: 45705


Get butt-cised




Ignore
« Reply #601 on: November 27, 2009, 08:51:21 PM »

jesus. it was just posted a couple of posts ago in this same thread.

Logged
NatsAddict

Offline Offline

Posts: 3750





Ignore
« Reply #602 on: November 27, 2009, 10:30:18 PM »

From Joe Frisaro (covers Fish for MLB)

Quote
#Marlins There is going to be plenty of speculation about Josh Johnson being trade bait. From what I'm hearing, don't buy into it.

about 2 hours ago from txt
Joe Frisaro (JoeFrisaro) on Twitter

Personally, from their track record, my opinion is that  JJ is gone by July 31, and maybe sooner depending on arby.  The Fish will likely lowball, $4+, and JJ will win if he puts $8 to $10 on the table, and won't get a single pay check of such a contract from the Fish.
Logged
ASSCLOWN
aka sportsfan882

Offline Offline

Posts: 45705


Get butt-cised




Ignore
« Reply #603 on: November 27, 2009, 11:00:23 PM »

lmao

Logged
PatsNats09
butthurt

Offline Offline

Posts: 4681




Ignore
« Reply #604 on: November 27, 2009, 11:59:54 PM »

Ken Grigsby:
Quote
From what I'm hearing, the Marlins are now actively shopping Josh Johnson, a dramatic change from only days ago when an extension seemed imminent. Potential targets could include the Yankees, Red Sox, Angels, and Mets.

http://www.thebaseballnews.com/hotstove09/traderumors=grisby.htm?post132.546
Logged
Lintyfresh85

Offline Offline

Posts: 3202


3-4-5




Ignore
« Reply #605 on: November 28, 2009, 11:11:11 AM »

How do the Mets always get in on these talks?

I thought their minor league system was bone dry.
Logged
Nat of the LivingDead

Online Online

Posts: 15052


The man is clear in his mind, but his soul is mad.


WWW

Ignore
« Reply #606 on: November 28, 2009, 11:38:31 AM »

How do the Mets always get in on these talks?

I thought their minor league system was bone dry.

Half the time the Mets are mentioned in any talks I always feel like it is just a media wet dream just to get people to pay attention. That franchise is like a falling turd from an airplane right onto a bullseye in the middle of some barren cornfield.
Logged
JCA-CrystalCity

Offline Offline

Posts: 2047

Dee-Fence! Dee-Fence! UZR is tougher to chant




Ignore
« Reply #607 on: November 28, 2009, 11:41:12 AM »

How do the Mets always get in on these talks?

I thought their minor league system was bone dry.

They have the second richest market in baseball, next to the other half of NY.  If it weren't for the Wilpons financial problems, the Mets likely would have Madoff with more free agents.
Logged
PatsNats09
butthurt

Offline Offline

Posts: 4681




Ignore
« Reply #608 on: November 28, 2009, 12:06:55 PM »

You know I completely BS'd that... fake quote, fake link (although I'm proud of my fake URL-making skills). Was trying to make SF even more annoyed.
Logged
Nathan

Offline Offline

Posts: 1975


yeeeEEEEAaAaAaAaAa




Ignore
« Reply #609 on: November 29, 2009, 02:33:43 AM »

You know I completely BS'd that... fake quote, fake link (although I'm proud of my fake URL-making skills). Was trying to make SF even more annoyed.
<applause> <applause> <applause>

For all of our nagging about sources, we all believed your fake one <laughing>
Logged
PatsNats09
butthurt

Offline Offline

Posts: 4681




Ignore
« Reply #610 on: November 29, 2009, 10:21:25 AM »

<applause> <applause> <applause>

For all of our nagging about sources, we all believed your fake one <laughing>


*taking a bow*
Logged
houston-nat

Offline Offline

Posts: 5696


Rizzo will make you an offer you can't refuse




Ignore
« Reply #611 on: December 01, 2009, 12:10:18 PM »

Jon Heyman's Twitter reports that the Phillies have signed Brian Schneider.
Logged
imref

Offline Offline

Posts: 438





Ignore
« Reply #612 on: December 03, 2009, 10:06:39 AM »

Phillies sign Polanco for 3B as well.
Logged
DPMOmaha

Offline Offline

Posts: 5262


Midwest Correspondant




Ignore
« Reply #613 on: December 03, 2009, 10:08:32 AM »

The Phils are becoming the Red Sox of the NL.  (IMO, there's currently no Yankees in the NL.  The Dodgers could be if they wanted to though.)
Logged
JCA-CrystalCity

Offline Offline

Posts: 2047

Dee-Fence! Dee-Fence! UZR is tougher to chant




Ignore
« Reply #614 on: December 03, 2009, 11:24:05 AM »

The Phils are becoming the Red Sox of the NL.  (IMO, there's currently no Yankees in the NL.  The Dodgers could be if they wanted to though.)

Quite right. They should have the resources and market to take on a $130m budget.  As their studs go through arbitration and they buy out free agency, they will have to expand their payroll.

The NL East should be about as financially strong as the AL East.  I would rank the financial potential of the teams as follows:

1) NYY
2) NYM
3) PHI & BOS (giving the sox credit for NESN)
5) WAS
6) TOR
7) ATL
8 ) BAL
9) FLA
10) TB

The top 7 should all be in the top 12 in baseball.
Logged
HalfSmokes

Online Online

Posts: 3264





Ignore
« Reply #615 on: December 03, 2009, 11:48:27 AM »

Don't forget Baltimore's market potential is essentially co-equal to DCs thanks to the MASN deal
Logged
JCA-CrystalCity

Offline Offline

Posts: 2047

Dee-Fence! Dee-Fence! UZR is tougher to chant




Ignore
« Reply #616 on: December 03, 2009, 12:00:16 PM »

Yes, but No Va is wealthier and more populous than north of Baltimore.  Both have nearly equal claims on MoCo, given the O's history and the soon-to-be-completed ICC <laughing>
Logged
ASSCLOWN
aka sportsfan882

Offline Offline

Posts: 45705


Get butt-cised




Ignore
« Reply #617 on: December 03, 2009, 12:22:29 PM »

The Phils have no need for Polanco. wtf
Logged
Lintyfresh85

Offline Offline

Posts: 3202


3-4-5




Ignore
« Reply #618 on: December 03, 2009, 12:47:23 PM »

Well, it also prevents any of their competitors from swooping in and picking him up. Smart move and makes that lineup even stronger.

He would have been a great fit at 2B and in the 2 hole in the lineup for the Nats.

Sigh.
Logged
JCA-CrystalCity

Offline Offline

Posts: 2047

Dee-Fence! Dee-Fence! UZR is tougher to chant




Ignore
« Reply #619 on: December 03, 2009, 02:33:32 PM »

The Phils have no need for Polanco. wtf

If they are playing him at third, then he can give them as good or better defense and a decent average out of the 7th / 8th spot. they might even bat him 2d, giving them a righty near the top of the order, and drop Victorino back to a traditional RBI position (note - this would be the wrong move sabremetrically, but I am not sure how Manuel thinks on these lines).  Plus, it gives them great coverage in case Utley gets injured. 
Logged
HalfSmokes

Online Online

Posts: 3264





Ignore
« Reply #620 on: December 03, 2009, 02:36:08 PM »

If they are playing him at third, then he can give them as good or better defense and a decent average out of the 7th / 8th spot. they might even bat him 2d, giving them a righty near the top of the order, and drop Victorino back to a traditional RBI position (note - this would be the wrong move sabremetrically, but I am not sure how Manuel thinks on these lines).  Plus, it gives them great coverage in case Utley gets injured. 

but at 3 years $18 million?
Logged
JCA-CrystalCity

Offline Offline

Posts: 2047

Dee-Fence! Dee-Fence! UZR is tougher to chant




Ignore
« Reply #621 on: December 03, 2009, 02:43:58 PM »

Too long / too much IMO, but for the sake of argument, if you project him as a 3 WAR player in 2010 and a 2 WAR (average) in 2011, you've gotten his 3d year for free or even a discount.

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/polanco-hits-the-market
Logged
HalfSmokes

Online Online

Posts: 3264





Ignore
« Reply #622 on: December 03, 2009, 02:50:46 PM »

Too long / too much IMO, but for the sake of argument, if you project him as a 3 WAR player in 2010 and a 2 WAR (average) in 2011, you've gotten his 3d year for free or even a discount.

http://www.fangraphs.com/blogs/index.php/polanco-hits-the-market

As a second baseman, move him to third and the value declines

Quote
With the glove, Polanco’s defense has always ranged from solid-to-spectacular. It’s a wee bit optimistic to expect a +10 season from him next year, but even with some age-based regression thrown in, he’s a plus defender at a premium defensive position. Combine that with his offensive skills and you’re looking at least a 3 win player with the potential for a little more.

Logged
blue911

Online Online

Posts: 7599





Ignore
« Reply #623 on: December 03, 2009, 03:19:36 PM »

Maybe the Phillies are planning on moving Utley to 3rd.
Logged
tomterp
Global Moderator
****
Online Online

Posts: 14208


Enough to make tough men weep.




Ignore
« Reply #624 on: December 03, 2009, 03:28:05 PM »

Maybe the Phillies are planning on moving Utley to 3rd.

He seems to play a pretty decent 2nd to me.  Yeah, he goes through a wild phase for a few weeks each season, but I'd leave him there if possible.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 27 28 29 30 31   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.10 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.13 seconds with 15 queries.