HalfSmokes
Offline
Posts: 3266
|
 |
« Reply #425 on: June 30, 2009, 08:31:03 AM » |
|
in regards to your original question, no, i don't think it's the next "obp" simply because it's one of many "new" statistics sabermatricians use to judge players. it just happens to be an easy one to understand and use
its just an attempt to see if a batting average is 'real' or not by seeing how lucky a guy is. Its really more useful for looking at pitchers since they tend to all have BABIPs in a narrower range, so something outside of that means either luck or defense. Hitters have a wider range, but they still tend to revert to their own mean.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PC
Offline
Posts: 13949
|
 |
« Reply #426 on: July 06, 2009, 07:48:45 PM » |
|
Is anybody watching the Phillies-Reds game? Cueto was responsible for 9 runs in 2/3 of an inning!  And I'm using him this week on one of my pitching teams because he pitches twice. Bum!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PC
Offline
Posts: 13949
|
 |
« Reply #427 on: July 06, 2009, 08:46:00 PM » |
|
The load the Reds are dumping against the Phillies...this might be the worst performance by a team, this season.
It's 16-1 in the 4th and the Phillies have scored in every inning!
...and now the Phillies are using their backups.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
HalfSmokes
Offline
Posts: 3266
|
 |
« Reply #428 on: July 06, 2009, 09:49:59 PM » |
|
Rollins, SS 4 4 3 1 2 0 2 .224 Victorino, CF 5 5 4 4 1 0 1 .308 Utley, 2B 3 1 2 4 1 1 0 .305 1-Bruntlett, PR-2B 2 2 1 1 0 1 1 .145 Howard, 1B 4 0 1 1 0 1 2 .252 2-Mayberry, PR-LF 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 .205 Werth, RF 5 2 2 5 0 2 1 .263 Dobbs, LF-1B 6 2 4 2 0 0 1 .271 Feliz, 3B 5 1 1 0 0 1 2 .291 Ruiz, C 4 1 1 1 1 0 0 .234 Hamels, P 4 2 2 2 0 2 2 .167 Walker, T, P 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .000 a-Stairs, PH 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 .276 Totals 43 22 21 21 7 9 12 22 to 1 in the 8th 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nathan
Online
Posts: 1984
yeeeEEEEAaAaAaAaAa
|
 |
« Reply #429 on: July 06, 2009, 11:51:00 PM » |
|
 Paul Janish (SS) pitched in the 9 th for the Reds. Pitchers IP H R ER BB SO HR PC-ST ERA J Cueto (L, 8-5) 0.2 5 9 9 3 1 2 49-25 3.45 D Herrera 2.1 5 3 3 1 2 1 52-36 2.62 N Masset 1.0 4 4 3 1 1 0 37-18 2.43 C Fisher 2.0 2 0 0 0 2 0 30-21 3.54 J Roenicke 1.0 1 0 0 0 2 0 14-11 0.00 P Janish 1.0 4 6 6 2 1 1 29-17 49.50 Totals 8.0 21 22 21 7 9 4 211-128 He did strike out Pedro Feliz 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NatsAddict
Offline
Posts: 3751
|
 |
« Reply #430 on: July 07, 2009, 10:07:24 AM » |
|
With Hanley sitting out, The Fredi moved Uggla into the 3 hole the past 2 games. Predictably, in his 5 opps with runners on, he's hit into 2 double plays (out of 4 chances with a runner on 1B). With men on, a pitcher has to be really dumb to try to strike the guy out when its almost a guarantee that if a man is on 1B that you'll get 2 outs if he makes contact. Uggla, or as he was christened last night, Dan "Party Pooper" Uggla, is now 7 for his last 65 chances with men on (a total of 85 men on), including 6 GIDP, which is double his number of runners driven in.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NatsAddict
Offline
Posts: 3751
|
 |
« Reply #431 on: July 07, 2009, 11:40:26 PM » |
|
Sitting on 199 after leaving 2 on base in the 6th, Uggla is likely to have one more chance tonight to get to 200 LOB before the ASG break - well before the ASG break.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NatsAddict
Offline
Posts: 3751
|
 |
« Reply #432 on: July 08, 2009, 12:20:38 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NatsAddict
Offline
Posts: 3751
|
 |
« Reply #433 on: July 08, 2009, 12:30:55 AM » |
|
Cast you vote for Danny Boy's most suitable nickname, or nominate one of your own:
Party Pooper DUGDP (Dan Uggla Ground into Double Play) Rally Killer Run Buster Mr. LOB K Mart F*ckin' Sh*thead!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
NatsAddict
Offline
Posts: 3751
|
 |
« Reply #435 on: July 09, 2009, 03:39:29 PM » |
|
Actually, Loria put in a much higher percentage than most.
Of the bond issue, only $300 of the $409 was for the stadium. Then, they are including future interest. Using the math as applied, your 25,000 car cost $40,000 and your $300,000 home costing nearly $800,000 if financed over similar terms. Would you say you lived in a $800,000 for the home or drive a $40,000 car?
Of the $2.4 billion, $1.991 is interest. Of the interest, $1.46 billion is due to the stadium. Along with $300 million in bonds for the stadium out of the $409 million in bonds, it comes to $1.76 billion over 40 years.
Miami Dade messed up by not issuing the bond when the first could have last fall, when rates were at artificial lows. Then then messed up further by continuing to delay and then came out when China and all other foreign central banks were dumping 30s, yields up and bond values down (believe it or not, Loria covered the shortfall resulting from the excessive discount out of his own pocket). Finally, they made the bonds 40s rather than 30s, which added an enormous amount of the interest expense. Miami Dade's ineptitude resulted in the $600 million in additional cost, not the Marlin or Loria (I gotta take a shower after defending Loria).
The total cost of the stadium is $1.76 to the taxpayers, of which $300 is present value (assuming yield == inflation), the Fish are paying $155 million, and Loria covered about $7 million in the shortfall from the sale of the bonds. The present value of the cost to the taxpayers is still less than half the present value of the cost to the taxpayers for Nationals Park.
I still can't figure out how the interest got so high, even over 40 years. Since the interest does not compound on the bonds, for the interest cost to get that high, the bonds would have to yield 12.17%. Not bad for a tax free AA muni. However, no bond went for more than 6.4%. The math doesn't work. Also, the original source is the Sun-Sentinel (not the Miami Herald), which isn't much more reliable than the National Enquirer. Maury Brown usually shows better judgement. Maybe he's still pissy that his lobbying efforts for the Fish to move to Portland didn't work out.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
HalfSmokes
Offline
Posts: 3266
|
 |
« Reply #436 on: July 09, 2009, 03:47:59 PM » |
|
Actually, Loria put in a much higher percentage than most.
Of the bond issue, only $300 of the $409 was for the stadium. Then, they are including future interest. Using the math as applied, your 25,000 car cost $40,000 and your $300,000 home costing nearly $800,000 if financed over similar terms. Would you say you lived in a $800,000 for the home or drive a $40,000 car?
Of the $2.4 billion, $1.991 is interest. Of the interest, $1.46 billion is due to the stadium. Along with $300 million in bonds for the stadium out of the $409 million in bonds, it comes to $1.76 billion over 40 years.
Miami Dade messed up by not issuing the bond when the first could have last fall, when rates were at artificial lows. Then then messed up further by continuing to delay and then came out when China and all other foreign central banks were dumping 30s, yields up and bond values down (believe it or not, Loria covered the shortfall resulting from the excessive discount out of his own pocket). Finally, they made the bonds 40s rather than 30s, which added an enormous amount of the interest expense. Miami Dade's ineptitude resulted in the $600 million in additional cost, not the Marlin or Loria (I gotta take a shower after defending Loria).
The total cost of the stadium is $1.76 to the taxpayers, of which $300 is present value (assuming yield == inflation), the Fish are paying $155 million, and Loria covered about $7 million in the shortfall from the sale of the bonds. The present value of the cost to the taxpayers is still less than half the present value of the cost to the taxpayers for Nationals Park.
I still can't figure out how the interest got so high, even over 40 years. Since the interest does not compound on the bonds, for the interest cost to get that high, the bonds would have to yield 12.17%. Not bad for a tax free AA muni. However, no bond went for more than 6.4%. The math doesn't work. Also, the original source is the Sun-Sentinel (not the Miami Herald), which isn't much more reliable than the National Enquirer. Maury Brown usually shows better judgement. Maybe he's still pissy that his lobbying efforts for the Fish to move to Portland didn't work out.
looks like the herald to me http://www.miamiherald.com/457/story/1131885.htmland yes I do consider financing costs before making purchases
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NatsAddict
Offline
Posts: 3751
|
 |
« Reply #437 on: July 09, 2009, 06:05:47 PM » |
|
Oh, you gotta consider the cost of financing, but consider the financing present value terms. Your assets acquired is not worth more just because you financed it. The Sentinel originally broke the story, and their TV news partners aired it a day before the Herald picked it up.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PatsNats09
butthurt
Offline
Posts: 4681
|
 |
« Reply #438 on: July 09, 2009, 06:27:25 PM » |
|
That's a ridiculous amount of interest. You might as well try and pay as much as possible upfront and save yourself a couple billion bucks.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
tomterp
|
 |
« Reply #439 on: July 09, 2009, 09:29:47 PM » |
|
That's a ridiculous amount of interest. You might as well try and pay as much as possible upfront and save yourself a couple billion bucks.
Often bonds like that are financed (ie, the interest and principle payments) from revenues generated by the asset, ie the stadium itself and related. If the thing pays for itself, why get all worked up about it?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
HalfSmokes
Offline
Posts: 3266
|
 |
« Reply #440 on: July 09, 2009, 09:42:17 PM » |
|
Often bonds like that are financed (ie, the interest and principle payments) from revenues generated by the asset, ie the stadium itself and related. If the thing pays for itself, why get all worked up about it?
because if it is still like this  it won't pay for itself
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NatsAddict
Offline
Posts: 3751
|
 |
« Reply #441 on: July 09, 2009, 10:25:01 PM » |
|
Actually, none of the bonds are paid for by stadium operations, but rather from tourist taxes. It should be better at the new location and with a roof, but I still expect not much more than 2 million a year after things get past the "new" factor. 25,000 a game is about where I think it will average. It could be more, at the Fish have among the highest TV ratings, and that only includes Broward and Miami Dade. For whatever reason, Palm Beach is in the MLB recognized area, but the Neilson's exclude it from the ratings. Anyway, if the viewer finally have a stadium that (1) they can get to the game if leaving straight from work and get there before the 3rd inning, (2) has local mass transit even if only for the city, (3) permits you to actually see a game without being a contortionist, (4) eliminates the better than 50% chance getting rained on sometime between BP and the end of the game June - September, it may do even better. The visiting teams will like it much better as the roof will prevent the rainouts of fielding and batting practices. Also, MLB will no longer have the Marlins have, by far other than the Cubs, the largest number of weekday day games, which they have on non-travel days just to cut out the chance of rain. A couple years ago (2005?), the Fish had something like 19 weekday home games when there were only 15 weekday home series - ridiculous when nobody can get to the stadium without taking a full day off work.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
PatsNats09
butthurt
Offline
Posts: 4681
|
 |
« Reply #442 on: July 09, 2009, 11:33:31 PM » |
|
Often bonds like that are financed (ie, the interest and principle payments) from revenues generated by the asset, ie the stadium itself and related. If the thing pays for itself, why get all worked up about it?
Because if you maxed out the up-front payment to a solid amount, you can turn the revenue into profit versus breaking even.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
houston-nat
Offline
Posts: 5701
Rizzo will make you an offer you can't refuse
|
 |
« Reply #443 on: July 11, 2009, 06:00:45 PM » |
|
Well, the Mets signed Angel Berroa. The division race is over!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
NatsAddict
Offline
Posts: 3751
|
 |
« Reply #444 on: July 17, 2009, 09:52:54 AM » |
|
Moyer improves to 13-2 over the Fish, allowing a single and a walk in 7.0 IP. Those were the only two baserunners of the night for the Fish. Jim Presley is the Randy St. Claire of hitting coaches. While again leading all of MLB in strikeouts for the 4th consecutive year, he does still need to do a little work to do to meet his objective of not only leading MLB, but to also for the 4th consecutive year set a new franchise in doing so.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ASSCLOWN
aka sportsfan882
Offline
Posts: 45705
Get butt-cised
|
 |
« Reply #445 on: July 22, 2009, 01:30:05 PM » |
|
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=4347145Tony Bernazard, a New York Mets executive, recently challenged one of club's minor league teams to a fight during a postgame clubhouse tirade, the New York Daily News reported, citing multiple sources with ties to the team.
Bernazard, the team's vice president for player development, pulled off his shirt and challenged the Double-A Binghamton Mets in the tirade, about 10 days before the All-Star break. He in particular targeted middle infield prospect Jose Coronado, according to the report.
The Mets will conduct an "internal investigation" of Bernazard, a major league source said, according to Foxsports.com.
Binghamton had gone 1-6 during an early July homestand that coincided with the outburst, losing three of those games by at least seven runs. The team was 37-58 and in last place in the Eastern League Northern Division entering Wednesday's scheduled games.
Allegations of underage drinking on the team were apparently another factor in Bernazard's tirade, an organization source said, according to the report.
"It's ridiculous that anyone in a professional baseball environment thinks it's acceptable," a friend of several players said, according to the report. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JCA-CrystalCity
Online
Posts: 2061
Dee-Fence! Dee-Fence! UZR is tougher to chant
|
 |
« Reply #446 on: July 22, 2009, 01:59:22 PM » |
|
By the way, I was at last night's game and afterward, I started talking to a Mets fan and asked, "so when are the Reyes and the other DL regulars coming back?" He replied, in something out of Bizzarro world, , "this team [the Mets] is pathetic, they should have better depth to cover for the guys on the DL, that line up was a joke, you guys at least look like you have some young players."
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
DCFan
Offline
Posts: 3596
What are you dense?
|
 |
« Reply #447 on: July 22, 2009, 02:07:50 PM » |
|
By the way, I was at last night's game and afterward, I started talking to a Mets fan and asked, "so when are the Reyes and the other DL regulars coming back?" He replied, in something out of Bizzarro world, , "this team [the Mets] is pathetic, they should have better depth to cover for the guys on the DL, that line up was a joke, you guys at least look like you have some young players." Sounds like he was saying something nice about the Nats while ripping his own team's FO to me.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Nat of the LivingDead
Offline
Posts: 15060
The man is clear in his mind, but his soul is mad.
|
 |
« Reply #448 on: July 22, 2009, 03:03:57 PM » |
|
The whole team?  Underage drinking? Fuuuuucked up in Bing!  This is one reason why a team shouldn't go public at all times. But then again-- it's entertaining as hell. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JCA-CrystalCity
Online
Posts: 2061
Dee-Fence! Dee-Fence! UZR is tougher to chant
|
 |
« Reply #449 on: July 22, 2009, 04:02:31 PM » |
|
Sounds like he was saying something nice about the Nats while ripping his own team's FO to me.
Yah, that's what was bizzarro world about it. We are usually the ones doing that.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|